1
ThumbsPlus v10 Questions / I can't sort by date photo originally taken
« on: 2016-12-29 08:50:14 »
> Well, you can't sort on something that isn't there and it looks like those images just don't have the required Original Date/Time in their EXIF data.
That's the thing, I think the data is there, it's just not populating the "Date Taken" field in TP. I don't know what causes that field to populate, but rebuilding the thumbs doesn't seem to do it. I don't know why some photos have the field populated, and other photos don't.
I've taken a screenshot of one of the files with missing Date Taken, but it shows data in all other date fields I can find.
With all that said, if 20 files have no Date Taken info, and I have Date Modified as the second sort value, why isn't it sorting by this field, which does have data? As I stated originally, photos are displayed in an order that does not honor the Date Modified of the files.
The following shows how I have set the sorting (Date Modified and Date Modified), and the 4 photos shown have the following "Modification Date" values...
2015-02-09T14:02:57.258298
2015-02-26T08:22:20.049808
2015-02-10T17:22:32.218788
2015-02-26T12:51:07.489452
So, it just feels broken to me. I have to assume it's just me, since I can't imagine that others wouldn't be complaining about wrong sorting; it's just such a basic part of any database or informational structure.
That's the thing, I think the data is there, it's just not populating the "Date Taken" field in TP. I don't know what causes that field to populate, but rebuilding the thumbs doesn't seem to do it. I don't know why some photos have the field populated, and other photos don't.
I've taken a screenshot of one of the files with missing Date Taken, but it shows data in all other date fields I can find.
With all that said, if 20 files have no Date Taken info, and I have Date Modified as the second sort value, why isn't it sorting by this field, which does have data? As I stated originally, photos are displayed in an order that does not honor the Date Modified of the files.
The following shows how I have set the sorting (Date Modified and Date Modified), and the 4 photos shown have the following "Modification Date" values...
2015-02-09T14:02:57.258298
2015-02-26T08:22:20.049808
2015-02-10T17:22:32.218788
2015-02-26T12:51:07.489452
So, it just feels broken to me. I have to assume it's just me, since I can't imagine that others wouldn't be complaining about wrong sorting; it's just such a basic part of any database or informational structure.